Taman Lestari Permai, Mukim Dengkil, Daerah Sepang, Selangor Darul Ehsan

The above housing project is located at Seri Kembangan, Serdang, Selangor, adjacent to the highway leading to Putrajaya. This housing project lies exactly opposite  Gate 2 Putrajaya. The construction of this project involved several phases of development. These phases are Phase 1A (238 housing units), Phase 1B (150 units), Phase 1C (68 units) and Phase 2 (133 units). The percentages of completion of each of these phases as at November, 2007 are 86% (for Phase 1A), 80% (for Phase 1B), 70% (for Phase 1C) and 90% for Phase 2.


Lestari Permai was lauched in the early 2004. This project should have been completed in 2 years after the date of the sale and purchase agreement executed, viz it should be duly occupied by early 2006. The main reason for the abandonment of this project was the financial problems faced by the developer–Europlus Construction Sdn Bhd, being a subsidiary for Kumpulan Talam Corporation Berhad (‘Talam’). The holding company–Talam too faced financial difficulties as they failed to balance the cash out flow and the cash in flow of their housing ventures, as the result of the repayment obligations they have to make to their financiers for an investment of a land of 11,878 acres, overdraft facilities and repayment of the company bonds in maturity against the cash in flow from the expected progress development claims and receipts, which Talam failed to obtain, due to  termination of the construction works. The termination was caused by the shortage of steel supplies and sands.


To overcome the problems of their abandoned housing projects, Talam have taken the following steps:


a)     Making new appointment of a new contractor and undertake certain joint ventures with other housing development contractors such as IJM (Corporation) Sdn. Bhd., IJM (Projects) Sdn. Bhd and Salam Kurnia Sdn. Bhd; and,

b)    Refund the deposit payments made by purchasers of eight housing projects.


Among the problems faced by purchasers as the result of the abandonment are:


a)     Inability to occupy the housing units on the date as promised by the developer;

b)    They have to pay monthly instalments to their respective financiers, as the financiers have released substantial portion of their housing loans to the developer;

c)     They have to rent other houses in the course awaiting the completion of the purported housing units;

d)    There are purchasers who have been blacklisted by the financiers as they are unable to regularize their housing loan accounts;

e)     There are purchasers who have divorced due to the mounting living expenses and insufficient incomes, partly due to the abandonment;

f)      Meetings and discussions with the authorities, for example, the Ministry of Housing and Local Government (MOH), always failed to render any positive outcomes and MOH, hitherto, have unable to solve their problems;

g)     There are some purchasers who have received wrong information regarding their housing project, from MOH;

h)    MOH does not categorise the late and problematic housing development projects undertaken by Talam and its subsidiaries as ‘abandoned housing projects’ in accordance with the MOH common and official definition of abandoned housing project on ‘abandoned housing project’. This has caused problems to purchasers, in their attempt to obtain confirmation of their projects as ‘abandoned housing projects’ for the purpose of getting reduction of monthly instalment payment from their respective financiers etc;

i)       MOH failed to enforce and carry out the legal provisions in the Housing Development (Control and Licensing) Act 1966 (Act 118) and its regulations and this had resulted in certain losses to the purchasers due to the abandonment.


Apart from Lestari Permai, there are many more housing development projects carried out by Talam and its subsidiary companies, which are also facing the same problems – late delivery and abandonment, viz:


a.     Bukit Beruntung (Europlus Sdn. Bhd);

b.     Putra Perdana (Kenshine Sdn. Bhd);

c.      Taman Puncak Jalil (Maxisegar Sdn. Bhd);

d.     Lagoon Perdana (Tenaga Gagah Sdn. Bhd);

e.      Ukay Perdana (Highrise) (Ukay Land Sdn. Bhd);

f.       Bukit Pandan Bistari (Supreme Precious);

g.     Ukay Perdana Superlink (Ukay Land Sdn. Bhd);

h.     Saujana Putra (Galian Juta Sdn. Bhd);

i.       Lestari Puchong (Lestari Puchong Sdn. Bhd);

j.       Bukit Pandan (Mudi Angkasa Development Sdn. Bhd);

k.     Bandar Pinggiran Cyber (Perspektif Perkasa Sdn. Bhd);

l.       Sierra Ukay (Terang Tanah Sdn. Bhd);

m.  Lestari Perdana (Abra Development Sdn. Bhd);

n.     Saujana Puchong (Expand Factor Sdn. Bhd);

o.     Saujana Putra (Galian Juta Sdn. Bhd);

p.    La Cottage (Metro Tegas Development Sdn. Bhd);

q.     Saujana Putra (Sanjung Hemat Sdn. Bhd);

r.      Templer Saujana (Abra Development Sdn. Bhd); and,

s.      Kinrara Perdana (Sentosa Restu (M) Sdn. Bhd).


See the pictures taken about the said abandoned Taman Lestari Permai.














7 responses to “Taman Lestari Permai, Mukim Dengkil, Daerah Sepang, Selangor Darul Ehsan

  1. Please notify me the progress of the project. Interested in buying the house in that area.

    • Salam,

      In my opinion, please check the developer’s reputation. Buy only houses developed by, preferably, the federal/state government developer. Not small scale developer. Check the assets and financial strength of the developer in Suruhanjaya Syarikat dan Ministry of HOusing and Local Government.

      To avoid any possibility that your purported houses under construction may be abandoned, buy completed house only, i.e through sub-sale. The price may be higher but you will be safe.


      Dr. Nuarrual Hilal Md. Dahlan

  2. i have a question-

    1) will the project take over by anothe development in the future??

    2)will the project open for sales back in the future?? where is that??

    • You may have to contact the Purchasers’ action committee for the latest information. As for me, it is advisable to proceed with the rehabilitation of the project, provided the available money is sufficient to finance the rehabilitation.

    • You may have to contact the Purchasers’ action committee for the latest information. As for me, it is advisable to proceed with the rehabilitation of the project, provided the available money is sufficient to finance the rehabilitation.

      Dr. Nuarrual Hilal Md. Dahlan, ACIS

  3. i nk thu harga?

  4. saya nk tanya rumah teres ada kosong ?dan bagaimana saya nk berhubung dengan syarikat berkenaan?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s